Paul Fletcher Anti Teal Con Job
Paul Fletcher's 'Con Job'—A Propaganda Masterclass in Losing Gracefully" - A Noisy takedown based on the rot written in the SMH, like below if you want to fester your eyes. "Fletcher suffered a 15.3 per cent drop in his primary vote in 2022 as his seat of Bradfield, in Sydney’s northern suburbs, went to preferences for the first time in its history."
Oh, Paul Fletcher. Our very own "man of the people," clutching his pearls and sobbing into his monogrammed hanky because, gasp, the voters dared exercise their democratic right! Apparently, when voters leave the Liberals, it’s not because they’re fed up with mediocrity wrapped in smug entitlement—oh no, it’s because they were “conned.”
Paul, mate, let's get real. You didn’t lose voters because of a sneaky teal scheme; you lost them because you and your party served up a buffet of nothing burgers for years. People were over the spin, the stagnation, and the arrogance—and now you’re trying to gaslight them into thinking it’s their fault for not falling in line? Bold move, Cotton.
"Giant Green Con Job," You Say?
Paul’s whinging about “green con jobs” is rich, considering the only thing the Liberals have been green about is their envy for anyone who actually cares about the planet. Claiming that the Teals only targeted Liberal seats? Of course they did, Paul—because Liberal MPs were the ones ignoring climate change, women’s rights, and integrity. Teals didn’t trick your voters; they showed up and said, “Hey, we’ll actually listen to you,” and the voters thought, “Wow, that’s refreshing. Let’s give it a go!”
If anyone’s running a con, it’s you, Paul, trying to rewrite history like the voters didn’t understand what they were doing. Spoiler alert: They knew exactly what they were doing when they yeeted you and your pals out of their electorates.
The Real Grift: Liberal Legacy Edition
Speaking of cons, let's chat about the real grift. You want to bang on about “chaos” and the need for “stability,” but what stability did the Liberals offer? Stability in housing unaffordability? Stability in wage stagnation? Stability in blaming everyone else for your failures? Paul, if the Liberals were a stable ship, it was the Titanic—only you somehow managed to hit the same iceberg three times.
And the gall to suggest that “chaos” comes from independents. No, mate, chaos came when you guys ignored the needs of your constituents for years, and the Teals came in to clean up your mess.
"Family Ties" Smear? Weak.
Oh, and the pièce de résistance—attacking Teal candidates for being related to former Liberal MPs. The logic here is breathtaking: “They’re Liberals, but not our kind of Liberals, so it’s a scam!” Paul, this isn’t Mean Girls. Just because Allegra Spender and Kate Chaney had family in the Liberal Party doesn’t mean they’re bound to your sinking ship forever. Maybe, just maybe, they saw the dumpster fire from up close and decided to join the adults in the room.
The Takeaway
Here’s the truth, Paul: The Teals didn’t con anyone. They offered voters what you couldn’t—representation that actually reflected their values. Your cries of “con job” reek of desperation, not conviction. Blaming the voters for rejecting you isn’t just bad form—it’s why they dumped you in the first place.
So, grab a mirror, Paul, and take a good, hard look. The only con job here is you trying to sell this sad little tantrum as political insight. The voters weren’t conned—they were liberated.
Source: https://hypalnk.com/hu50g